TTU Device Engineering

Temporal Theory of the Universe  ·  Lemeshko A.  ·  Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv  ·  ORCID: 0000-0001-8003-3168

Engineering basis — key equations

F = −χτ · m · c² · ∇ln(τ)
W_eff = m · g · χτ → 0
χτ = f(E, B, ω) — controllable
G_X = G_H × m_grav / m_inert

Darmos (2022) confirms G depends on material composition in Cavendish experiments (p = 3.3×10⁻¹⁴) — directly validating TTU's temporal susceptibility χτ mechanism. Different materials have different G_X = G_H × (m_grav / m_inert), meaning gravitational coupling is tunable. Three engineering pathways follow: suppressing χτ → levitation; creating ∇τ asymmetry → direct thrust; injecting a τ-gradient into exhaust → Isp amplification.

Device 1 — electrogravitational resonator (EGR) · zero weight / levitation

HV+ · +100 kV HV− · −100 kV vacuum chamber · χτ control zone E↓ E↓ B⊙ B⊙ payload m χτ = 1.0000 W = 9.810 m/s² state: passive RF source f₀ = 0.452 MHz HV capacitor solenoid · B = 1–10 T W_eff → 0 at resonance HV− plate
χτ (susceptibility)
1.0000
W_eff / W₀
100.0%
Weight reduction
0.0%
Platform stage
Passive

Device 2 — chrono-phase modulator (CPM) · direct temporal gradient propulsion

Θ low Θ high ∇Θ — temporal density gradient · object slides toward high Θ RF src 1 φ = 0° RF src 2 φ = 90° spacecraft I_TTU = 0.00 F_τ = 0.00 mN/kg Δφ = 90° I_TTU = 0.000 · bifurcation threshold: 0.70 thrust state: off
TTU-Index I_TTU
0.000
F_τ (mN/kg)
0.00
vs ion thruster
—
Thrust state
Off

Device 3 — temporal gradient amplifier (TGA) · reactive engine boost

combustion chamber nozzle CPM ring Isp_eff = 450 s Isp comparison baseline: 450 s effective: 450 s gain: +0.0% χτ modifies exhaust m_inert → higher thrust per kg fuel
Isp baseline (s)
450
Isp effective (s)
450
Isp gain
+0.0%
ΔV improvement
+0.0%